<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Cosmological Simulations of Galaxy Formation · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1909.07976/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1909.07976/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Cosmological Simulations of Galaxy Formation — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37045466</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1909.07976:37045466</guid><pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2023 07:00:30 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; when you have a mass distribution that can be arbitrarily assigned in space, it feels like there are a lot of &amp;quot;nice things you could explain&amp;quot; Like an eight-planet star system, or a star system with a hot Jupiter, or a multi-star system with no planets, all arising within the same giant molecular cloud (GMC)? Even though the cloud-elements behave sanely, even small arbitrary changes in initial values can produce dramatically different later arrangements. Replace the galactic GMC with a dark matter filament in the cosmic web, and why be surprised that all sorts of galaxies form within? I…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1909.07976/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.GA</category></item></channel></rss>
