<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Deep neural network approximations for Monte Carlo algorithms · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1908.10828/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1908.10828/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Deep neural network approximations for Monte Carlo algorithms — mentioned by jessaustin</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24294258</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1908.10828:24294258</guid><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2020 14:53:34 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;[1] https://diffeqflux.sciml.ai/dev/layers/BasisLayers/ [2] https://diffeqflux.sciml.ai/dev/layers/TensorLayer/ [3] https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.10828&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1908.10828/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.NA</category></item><item><title>Deep neural network approximations for Monte Carlo algorithms — mentioned by ChrisRackauckas</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24293341</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1908.10828:24293341</guid><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2020 13:14:44 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;For reference, the DiffEqFlux library has a bunch of classical basis layers [1] and ways to tensor product them [2] for this reason. The real answer as to when to use a neural network is quite complicated [3], but in summary the results all point to the fact that for approximating an R^n -&amp;gt; R^m function, one only needs polynomially many parameters in order to do it well (as proven in a few cases like in that linked paper for &amp;quot;any case where Monte Carlo algorithms are not exponential in dimension&amp;quot;). Tensor products of classical basis functions have to cover every combination of terms…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1908.10828/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.NA</category></item></channel></rss>
