<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Again, random numbers fall mainly in the planes: xorshift128+ generators · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1908.10020/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1908.10020/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Again, random numbers fall mainly in the planes: xorshift128+ generators — mentioned by saithound</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49311548</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1908.10020:49311548</guid><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 15:45:34 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Ah yes, Xorshift, the RANDU [1] of the 21st century [2]. There is no real use case for better non-CS generators, as explained by adrian_b back in 2021 [3]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RANDU [2] https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.10020 [3] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28886698&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1908.10020/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
