<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Committee Draft of JPEG XL Image Coding System · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1908.03565/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1908.03565/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Committee Draft of JPEG XL Image Coding System — mentioned by zorgmonkey</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35562698</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1908.03565:35562698</guid><pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 22:01:09 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The C++ committee makes draft versions of the standard available for free[0], I&amp;#x27;ve heard that often the last draft before a new standard version is published is almost identical to the published version. It would be awesome if someone involved with JPEG-XL could arrange for the same. Edit: I found https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.03565 but it hasn&amp;#x27;t been updated since 2019. [0] https://eel.is/c++draft/&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1908.03565/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>eess.IV</category></item><item><title>Committee Draft of JPEG XL Image Coding System — mentioned by twotwotwo</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22462090</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1908.03565:22462090</guid><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2020 06:14:10 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, I appreciate the corrections and detail. I was mostly going by the committee draft on the arXiv (https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.03565 ), which still mentioned the quantization constraint (J.3) and a &amp;quot;mathematically lossless&amp;quot; mode (annex O) distinct from modular. &amp;quot;Four formats&amp;quot; was just imprecise wording on my part. The material already public about JPEG XL&amp;#x27;s design rationale, testing, and so on has been really fun to follow as an outsider. I selfishly hope there&amp;#x27;s more of it as the work on it and rollout continue. Even with the standard itself public, a lot can be mysterious to those not…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1908.03565/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>eess.IV</category></item><item><title>Committee Draft of JPEG XL Image Coding System — mentioned by undecidabot</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21612709</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1908.03565:21612709</guid><pubDate>Sat, 23 Nov 2019 05:55:39 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Slides: https://www.slideshare.net/cloudinarymarketing/imagecon-2019... Background: JPEG XL is a combination of Cloudinary&amp;#x27;s FUIF [1] (successor of FLIF [2]) and Google&amp;#x27;s Pik [3]. Committee Draft (Aug 2019): https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.03565 Technical Details: https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of... Features / Goals: - high quality compression (&amp;gt; 60% over JPEG-1) - royalty-free with open source implementations available from the start - versatile: supports alpha transparency, high bit depth (16-bit), lossless compression, animations - progressive decoding / &amp;quot;responsive…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1908.03565/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>eess.IV</category></item><item><title>Committee Draft of JPEG XL Image Coding System — mentioned by twotwotwo</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21187159</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1908.03565:21187159</guid><pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2019 23:36:54 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;A potential future option I only just learned about is JPEG XL (not XR!) which is proposed as a royalty-free successor to the JPEG we know. The draft is at https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.03565 and a little bit about what it has and why is at https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of... (but I haven&amp;#x27;t found nearly as much public detail on tools, reasoning behind choices, etc. as there is for e.g. AV1). The most interesting bit of it is that it contains a JPEG1 recompressor that saves about 20% space but allows exact reconstruction of the original file. It uses more modern…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1908.03565/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>eess.IV</category></item></channel></rss>
