<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Energy Conversion via Metal Nanolayers · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1907.13170/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1907.13170/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Energy Conversion via Metal Nanolayers — mentioned by leoedin</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20759316</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1907.13170:20759316</guid><pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2019 17:29:41 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The power generation potential given is in units which make it almost useless. A kWh is a unit of energy, converted into a frame of reference more useful than the joule. Saying that a device can generate 2 kWh doesn&amp;#x27;t really tell you much - it could generate that in 10 seconds (good) or 10 years (bad). I think the quoted figure was meant to be in kW - a unit of power, which is a much more useful piece of information. I looked at the original paper (here: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.13170.pdf) but couldn&amp;#x27;t find any reference to the 2kWh quoted from the researchers. If the suggestion is correct…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1907.13170/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.app-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
