<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1907.12875/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1907.12875/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods — mentioned by tyfon</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22359469</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1907.12875:22359469</guid><pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 19:33:13 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I stand corrected, the current Planck analysis seems to take in account that we are moving through the CMB rest frame although I need to read a bit more. It&amp;#x27;s a long paper [1] It was the earlier Planck measurements that did not account for this. [1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.12875.pdf&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1907.12875/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.CO</category></item></channel></rss>
