<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Can redshift errors bias measurements of the Hubble Constant? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1907.12639/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1907.12639/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Can redshift errors bias measurements of the Hubble Constant? — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21733433</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1907.12639:21733433</guid><pubDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2019 23:50:00 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; unintuitive I don&amp;#x27;t think it&amp;#x27;s just you. Maybe I can help; unfortunately developing intuition without going through the mathematics even at an introductory level [as in [1]] is a hard road. The tl;dr is that the objects are certainly moving apart; the question is whether or not the distance between them is increasing, and that depends on the coordinates in which one measures distance. In the cosmological case (and there are others in other areas of physics) the distant astrophysical objects aren&amp;#x27;t moving spatially in one particular set of coordinates, and that set is deliberately…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1907.12639/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.CO</category></item></channel></rss>
