HackerPapers

arXiv:1907.10597cs.CY

Green AI

Roy Schwartz, Jesse Dodge, Noah A. Smith, Oren Etzioni

Abstract

The computations required for deep learning research have been doubling every few months, resulting in an estimated 300,000x increase from 2012 to 2018 [2]. These computations have a surprisingly large carbon footprint [38]. Ironically, deep learning was inspired by the human brain, which is remarkably energy efficient. Moreover, the financial cost of the computations can make it difficult for academics, students, and researchers, in particular those from emerging economies, to engage in deep learning research. This position paper advocates a practical solution by making efficiency an evaluation criterion for research alongside accuracy and related measures. In addition, we propose reporting the financial cost or "price tag" of developing, training, and running models to provide baselines for the investigation of increasingly efficient methods. Our goal is to make AI both greener and more inclusive---enabling any inspired undergraduate with a laptop to write high-quality research papers. Green AI is an emerging focus at the Allen Institute for AI.

arXiv comments
12 pages
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CYComputers and Society cs.CLComputation and Language cs.CVComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition cs.LGMachine Learning stat.MEMethodology (Statistics)

On Hacker News

Linked by 2 identifiable commenters in 2 comments across 2 threads, from Feb 2020 to Feb 2022. Found in 4 HN submissions from Jul 2019 to Mar 2022. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments2 threads

    • Related to the topic of marginal benefits of AI models versus their costs: Green AI (Roy Schwartz, Jesse Dodge, Noah A. Smith, Oren Etzioni - 2019) https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.10597

      moandcompanyView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

  • Green AI
  • Ask HN: What is your take on carbon emissions of Machine Learning

    At the latest since the widely cited article on Green AI [1], there has been increased discussion about the energy consumption of ML. Whenever I talk to colleagues about this, we always agree that there is a dangerous potential lying dormant here, but somehow it cannot be properly grasped. There is simply a lack of really good data. Calculators for emission like from Victor Schmidt and the whole Yoshua Bengio Team at Mila [2] [3] are very good tools for your own use, but can tell you little…

  • Ask HN: What is your take on carbon emissions of Machine Learning

    At the latest since the widely cited article on Green AI [1], there has been increased discussion about the energy consumption of ML. Whenever I talk to colleagues about this, we always agree that there is a dangerous potential lying dormant here, but somehow it cannot be properly grasped. There is simply a lack of really good data. Calculators for emission like from Victor Schmidt and the whole Yoshua Bengio Team at Mila [2] [3] are very good tools for your own use, but can tell you little…

  • Green AI

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.