<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Dark Patterns at Scale: Findings from a Crawl of 11K Shopping Websites · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1907.07032/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1907.07032/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Dark Patterns at Scale: Findings from a Crawl of 11K Shopping Websites — mentioned by TAKEMYMONEY</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31315175</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1907.07032:31315175</guid><pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2022 15:15:14 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The multivariate test is trying to increase ad clicks, and the result is a poor UX. That&amp;#x27;s not exactly an alternate theory. Is it a dark pattern? That&amp;#x27;s not the first term I&amp;#x27;d use to describe it, but perhaps it falls under &amp;quot;Misdirection&amp;quot; mentioned at https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.07032.pdf (page 12).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1907.07032/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.HC</category></item></channel></rss>
