<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The continuous Bernoulli: fixing a pervasive error in variational autoencoders · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1907.06845/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1907.06845/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The continuous Bernoulli: fixing a pervasive error in variational autoencoders — mentioned by alentist</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25240757</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1907.06845:25240757</guid><pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2020 21:34:26 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; I see it’s equivalent to a Beta distribution. It&amp;#x27;s not. The beta distribution is p(x) ∝ x^(α-1) (1-x)^(β-1). x is in the bases. The continuous Bernoulli distribution is p(x) ∝ λ^x (1-λ)^x. x is in the exponents. As https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.06845 says: &amp;gt; the continuous Bernoulli is not a beta distribution (the main difference between these two distributions is how they concentrate mass around the extrema, see appendix 1 for details) The appendix is available here (under &amp;quot;Supplemental&amp;quot;): https://papers.nips.cc/paper/2019/hash/f82798ec8909d23e55679...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1907.06845/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>stat.ML</category></item><item><title>The continuous Bernoulli: fixing a pervasive error in variational autoencoders — mentioned by sdenton4</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25235878</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1907.06845:25235878</guid><pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2020 07:03:19 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Looks like this paper gives some background: https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.06845 I&amp;#x27;ve dabbled in VAEs, but haven&amp;#x27;t read this paper. Anyone want to try an ELI5thYearGradStudent?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1907.06845/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>stat.ML</category></item></channel></rss>
