<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Cryptocurrency Egalitarianism: A Quantitative Approach · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1907.02434/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1907.02434/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Cryptocurrency Egalitarianism: A Quantitative Approach — mentioned by dimkarakostas</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25986962</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1907.02434:25986962</guid><pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 09:11:30 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Proof of Stake not only replicates the same dynamics that Bitcoin was designed to eliminate (more wealth -&amp;gt; more power in system) Bitcoin may have been _aimed_ at eliminating the &amp;quot;rich get richer&amp;quot; system, but in fact it failed at it, as others comment below. It has been formally shown [1] that investors who have enough money to buy the most efficient ASICs out there earn disproportionately more, compared to smaller investors who can only afford less efficient ASICs/GPUs; in contrast, in PoS every investor has a fixed ROI for each one of their $ (regardless of their total investment); as…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1907.02434/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CY</category></item></channel></rss>
