HackerPapers

arXiv:1907.00263q-bio.NC

A Power Efficient Artificial Neuron Using Superconducting Nanowires

Emily Toomey, Ken Segall, Karl K. Berggren

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

With the rising societal demand for more information-processing capacity with lower power consumption, alternative architectures inspired by the parallelism and robustness of the human brain have recently emerged as possible solutions. In particular, spiking neural networks (SNNs) offer a bio-realistic approach, relying on pulses analogous to action potentials as units of information. While software encoded networks provide flexibility and precision, they are often computationally expensive. As a result, hardware SNNs based on the spiking dynamics of a device or circuit represent an increasingly appealing direction. Here, we propose to use superconducting nanowires as a platform for the development of an artificial neuron. Building on an architecture first proposed for Josephson junctions, we rely on the intrinsic nonlinearity of two coupled nanowires to generate spiking behavior, and use electrothermal circuit simulations to demonstrate that the nanowire neuron reproduces multiple characteristics of biological neurons. Furthermore, by harnessing the nonlinearity of the superconducting nanowire's inductance, we develop a design for a variable inductive synapse capable of both excitatory and inhibitory control. We demonstrate that this synapse design supports direct fanout, a feature that has been difficult to achieve in other superconducting architectures, and that the nanowire neuron's nominal energy performance is competitive with that of current technologies.

arXiv comments
12 figures, 1 table
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
q-bio.NCNeurons and Cognition cond-mat.supr-conSuperconductivity cs.NENeural and Evolutionary Computing

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Aug 2019 to Aug 2019. Found in 1 HN submission from Jul 2019 to Jul 2019. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.