Understanding More about Human and Machine Attention in Deep Neural Networks — mentioned by gillesjacobs

Sat, 10 Dec 2022 21:40:26 GMT

> Doesn't this also involve people not having another category aside from "cognition" to put natural language processing acts in? Yes, of course this might be an even more primary reason; do not attribute to malice what can be explained by laziness. However, AI researchers should be wary of their language, that point is hammered in most curricula I have seen. So at the least it is negligence. > I mean, there's a common counter argument to the "this is not cognition" position. That is: "you're just using 'cognition' as a placeholder for whatever these systems can't do". Very valid point, but…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Understanding More about Human and Machine Attention in Deep Neural Networks · HackerPapers discussions

Understanding More about Human and Machine Attention in Deep Neural Networks — mentioned by gillesjacobs