<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Non-zero-sum Stackelberg Budget Allocation Game for Computational Advertising · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1906.05998/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1906.05998/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Non-zero-sum Stackelberg Budget Allocation Game for Computational Advertising — mentioned by NotOscarWilde</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20800198</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1906.05998:20800198</guid><pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2019 14:35:56 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; As an aside, I would love that more scientific papers use original names in their original scripts in the references section in addition to transcription, the way Knuth does it in tAoCP. Being a scientist, I believe most of my colleagues prefer to cite names exactly as the authors typeset them -- therefore, if there is a work by Karel Čapek, I would cite him as [Čapek, 1921] but I would not re-type a name like Ken-ichi Kawarabayashi back into the &amp;quot;original&amp;quot; spelling if the author himself writes it this way in a paper (e.g. [1]). And on top of that, sometimes (with say Japanese-Americans)…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1906.05998/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.GT</category></item></channel></rss>
