HackerPapers

arXiv:1906.05754cs.CR

Probing the Mystery of Cryptocurrency Theft: An Investigation into Methods for Taint Analysis

Tin Tironsakkul, Manuel Maarek, Andrea Eross, Mike Just

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Since the creation of Bitcoin, transaction tracking is one of the prominent means for following the movement of Bitcoins involved in illegal activities. Although every Bitcoin transaction is recorded in the blockchain database, which is transparent for anyone to observe and analyse, Bitcoin's pseudonymity system and transaction obscuring techniques still allow criminals to disguise their transaction trail. While there have been a few attempts to develop tracking methods, there is no accepted evaluation method to measure their accuracy. Therefore, this paper investigates strategies for transaction tracking by introducing two new tainting methods, and proposes an address profiling approach with a metrics-based evaluation framework. We use our approach and framework to compare the accuracy of our new tainting methods with the previous tainting techniques, using data from two real Bitcoin theft transactions and several related control transactions.

arXiv comments
13 pages 12 figures, 3 tables
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CRCryptography and Security

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 3 comments across 2 threads, from Apr 2021 to Aug 2022.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments2 threads

    • AFAIK exchanges will not accept certain outputs, this is probably based on taint analysis. I believe the FIFO method [1] is the most accurate and probably used by exchanges [1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1906.05754.pdf

      spinnyView on HNParent context

    • exchanges keep lists of stolen coins and probably use taint analysis https://arxiv.org/pdf/1906.05754.pdf

      spinnyView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.