<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Presence-Only Geographical Priors for Fine-Grained Image Classification · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1906.05272/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1906.05272/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Presence-Only Geographical Priors for Fine-Grained Image Classification — mentioned by murphyslab</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37615810</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1906.05272:37615810</guid><pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2023 18:30:54 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m pretty excited about this. Until yesterday, iNaturalist, a platform for recording and identifying observations of organisms &amp;amp; citizen science, used a &amp;quot;Seen Nearby&amp;quot; rubric when selecting which predictions from its computer vision to show to a user: &amp;gt; What does &amp;quot;Seen Nearby&amp;quot; mean? &amp;gt; The “Seen Nearby” label on the computer vision suggestions indicates that there is a Research Grade observation, or an observation that would be research grade if it wasn&amp;#x27;t captive, of that taxon that is: &amp;gt; - within nine 1-degree grid cells in around the observation&amp;#x27;s coordinates and &amp;gt; - observed around that…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1906.05272/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
