<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Modeling the light curve of `Oumuamua: evidence for torque and disc-like shape · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1906.03696/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1906.03696/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Modeling the light curve of `Oumuamua: evidence for torque and disc-like shape — mentioned by robocat</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22864428</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1906.03696:22864428</guid><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2020 10:36:40 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Here’s a 2019 preprint that concludes “We show that cigar-shaped models suffer from a fine-tuning problem and have only 16 per cent probability to produce light curve minima as deep as the ones present in `Oumuamua&amp;#x27;s light curve. Disc-shaped models, on the other hand, are very likely (at 91 per cent) to produce minima of the required depth.” https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.03696 So it seems like there is still a lot of conjecture involved... Yet the National Geographic article misleads by showing an artists impression (pictures are truthy) while treating the elongated shape as fact on every line…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1906.03696/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.EP</category></item></channel></rss>
