<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hamiltonian Neural Networks · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1906.01563/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1906.01563/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Hamiltonian Neural Networks — mentioned by ylem</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23909729</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1906.01563:23909729</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2020 18:57:49 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;There were some interesting talks on neural differentiation applied to physics at ICLR. You probably saw: https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.01563 Very fun!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1906.01563/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.NE</category></item><item><title>Hamiltonian Neural Networks — mentioned by seesawtron</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23620402</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1906.01563:23620402</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2020 21:15:41 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Hamiltonian NNs are not a new thing. There was a NIPS 2019 paper [0] that attempted to do that same for some toy problems. In general the idea of including model or context-based information into neural networks goes along the line of Kahneman&amp;#x27;s System I and System II of the human mind. System I is the &amp;quot;emotional&amp;quot; brain that is fast and makes decisions quickly while System II is the &amp;quot;rational&amp;quot; brain that is slow and expensive and takes time to compute a response. Researchers have been trying to develop ML models that utilize this dichotomy by building corresponding dual modules but the major…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1906.01563/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.NE</category></item><item><title>Hamiltonian Neural Networks — mentioned by shoyer</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22258885</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1906.01563:22258885</guid><pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 18:43:09 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#x27;s actually extraordinarily difficult to get a DNN model to accurately predict planetary motion over arbitrary time horizons. RNNs have a tendency to either decay or blow-up. The only way I know to make neural nets work well for this problem is to build in lots of physics into the model architecture, e.g., conservation of energy: https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.01563&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1906.01563/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.NE</category></item></channel></rss>
