https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1906.00080/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMThttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34809012urn:hackerpapers:mention:1906.00080:34809012Wed, 15 Feb 2023 19:12:09 GMT<p>No it does not, it would be irresponsible to do that on private data. There&#x27;s a very clear line between data posted publicly and data held privately, especially in terms of copyright. I doubt it will ever be default opt-in for something as sensitive e-mail and docs. One exception to that is scanning for CSAM and Terrorism and DMCA. And with DMCA, it&#x27;s automated based on file hash, and you still maintain access to your files, you are just limited from sharing them. Ads in gmail aren&#x27;t based on content, but other online activity while logged in. I think the other exception to that is smart…</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1906.00080/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>cs.CLhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34808913urn:hackerpapers:mention:1906.00080:34808913Wed, 15 Feb 2023 19:05:30 GMT<p>Email contents are used to generate a model for Smart Compose in Gmail [1]. I assume that Google docs works similarly. [1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1906.00080.pdf</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1906.00080/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>cs.CL