HackerPapers

arXiv:1905.12516cs.CL

Racial Bias in Hate Speech and Abusive Language Detection Datasets

Thomas Davidson, Debasmita Bhattacharya, Ingmar Weber

Abstract

Technologies for abusive language detection are being developed and applied with little consideration of their potential biases. We examine racial bias in five different sets of Twitter data annotated for hate speech and abusive language. We train classifiers on these datasets and compare the predictions of these classifiers on tweets written in African-American English with those written in Standard American English. The results show evidence of systematic racial bias in all datasets, as classifiers trained on them tend to predict that tweets written in African-American English are abusive at substantially higher rates. If these abusive language detection systems are used in the field they will therefore have a disproportionate negative impact on African-American social media users. Consequently, these systems may discriminate against the groups who are often the targets of the abuse we are trying to detect.

arXiv comments
To appear in the proceedings of the Third Abusive Language Workshop (https://sites.google.com/view/alw3/) at the Annual Meeting for the Association for Computational Linguistics 2019. Please cite the published version
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CLComputation and Language cs.LGMachine Learning

On Hacker News

Linked by 2 identifiable commenters in 2 comments across 1 thread, from Jun 2022 to Jun 2022. Found in 1 HN submission from Jun 2022 to Jun 2022. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

  1. [dead] 2 comments
    • Found the same story published 3 years ago with better title: "Study finds racial bias in tweets flagged as hate speech" https://as.cornell.edu/news/study-finds-racial-bias-tweets-f... >“When we as researchers, or the people we pay online to do crowdsourced annotation, look at…

      visargaView on HNParent context

    • The original paper (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1905.12516.pdf) draws a different conclusion from what the article claims. Read Section 5 (Discussion) for details. Also, the analysis seems to be limited to looking at just two words, and to two groups (black and white), so I'm not sure…

      Ar-CurunirView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.