FPC-BI: Fast Probabilistic Consensus within Byzantine Infrastructures — mentioned by epF8fY

Tue, 01 Jun 2021 19:59:52 GMT

There are a lot of negative comments on this thread. I think a lot of the criticism is valid, but also somewhat out of date. I've followed this project for quite some time and it's true that the original version of IOTA in 2017 was deeply flawed, used some questionable (to say the least) design decisions like winternitz one time signatures and trinary. Some of the founders acted in really ugly ways online when people identified the many real problems with the protocol. But in the last year or so the project has made a lot of interesting developments, redesigned the protocol to remove the…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

FPC-BI: Fast Probabilistic Consensus within Byzantine Infrastructures — HN submission

Tue, 28 May 2019 13:28:35 GMT

On fast probabilistic consensus in the Byzantine setting

2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

FPC-BI: Fast Probabilistic Consensus within Byzantine Infrastructures · HackerPapers discussions

FPC-BI: Fast Probabilistic Consensus within Byzantine Infrastructures — mentioned by epF8fY

FPC-BI: Fast Probabilistic Consensus within Byzantine Infrastructures — HN submission