<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Uplifting AdS3/CFT2 to Flat Space Holography · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1905.09809/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1905.09809/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Uplifting AdS3/CFT2 to Flat Space Holography — mentioned by zachf</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30814636</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1905.09809:30814636</guid><pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2022 19:32:25 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Think about 2D surfaces. Which ones are the most symmetric? A flat plane is a very nice space: every point is as good as any other (there’s nothing intrinsic to any point to distinguish any point from any other, except arbitrarily), and no direction is particularly special either. A space like that has a lot of symmetries. A sphere also has a lot of symmetries, it also has no directions or points which are distinguished until you declare, “this is my North Pole” arbitrarily. (The earth isn’t a perfect sphere of course and we can use the imperfections as the way we define north and south.) The…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1905.09809/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item></channel></rss>
