HackerPapers

arXiv:1905.01392cs.LG

A Survey on Neural Architecture Search

Martin Wistuba, Ambrish Rawat, Tejaswini Pedapati

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

The growing interest in both the automation of machine learning and deep learning has inevitably led to the development of a wide variety of automated methods for neural architecture search. The choice of the network architecture has proven to be critical, and many advances in deep learning spring from its immediate improvements. However, deep learning techniques are computationally intensive and their application requires a high level of domain knowledge. Therefore, even partial automation of this process helps to make deep learning more accessible to both researchers and practitioners. With this survey, we provide a formalism which unifies and categorizes the landscape of existing methods along with a detailed analysis that compares and contrasts the different approaches. We achieve this via a comprehensive discussion of the commonly adopted architecture search spaces and architecture optimization algorithms based on principles of reinforcement learning and evolutionary algorithms along with approaches that incorporate surrogate and one-shot models. Additionally, we address the new research directions which include constrained and multi-objective architecture search as well as automated data augmentation, optimizer and activation function search.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.LGMachine Learning cs.CVComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition cs.NENeural and Evolutionary Computing stat.MLMachine Learning (Statistics)

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Jun 2019 to Jun 2019. Found in 1 HN submission from May 2019 to May 2019. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.