HackerPapers

arXiv:1904.13387cs.LG

Risk-Averse Explore-Then-Commit Algorithms for Finite-Time Bandits

Ali Yekkehkhany, Ebrahim Arian, Mohammad Hajiesmaili, Rakesh Nagi

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

In this paper, we study multi-armed bandit problems in explore-then-commit setting. In our proposed explore-then-commit setting, the goal is to identify the best arm after a pure experimentation (exploration) phase and exploit it once or for a given finite number of times. We identify that although the arm with the highest expected reward is the most desirable objective for infinite exploitations, it is not necessarily the one that is most probable to have the highest reward in a single or finite-time exploitations. Alternatively, we advocate the idea of risk-aversion where the objective is to compete against the arm with the best risk-return trade-off. Then, we propose two algorithms whose objectives are to select the arm that is most probable to reward the most. Using a new notion of finite-time exploitation regret, we find an upper bound for the minimum number of experiments before commitment, to guarantee an upper bound for the regret. As compared to existing risk-averse bandit algorithms, our algorithms do not rely on hyper-parameters, resulting in a more robust behavior in practice, which is verified by the numerical evaluation.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
2019 IEEE 58th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC)
DOI
doi:10.1109/CDC40024.2019.9142286
Subjects
cs.LGMachine Learning stat.MLMachine Learning (Statistics)

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 1 HN submission from May 2019 to May 2019. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.