HackerPapers

arXiv:1904.10922cs.LG

The Scientific Method in the Science of Machine Learning

Jessica Zosa Forde, Michela Paganini

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

In the quest to align deep learning with the sciences to address calls for rigor, safety, and interpretability in machine learning systems, this contribution identifies key missing pieces: the stages of hypothesis formulation and testing, as well as statistical and systematic uncertainty estimation -- core tenets of the scientific method. This position paper discusses the ways in which contemporary science is conducted in other domains and identifies potentially useful practices. We present a case study from physics and describe how this field has promoted rigor through specific methodological practices, and provide recommendations on how machine learning researchers can adopt these practices into the research ecosystem. We argue that both domain-driven experiments and application-agnostic questions of the inner workings of fundamental building blocks of machine learning models ought to be examined with the tools of the scientific method, to ensure we not only understand effect, but also begin to understand cause, which is the raison d'être of science.

arXiv comments
4 pages + 1 appendix. Presented at the ICLR 2019 Debugging Machine Learning Models workshop
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.LGMachine Learning stat.MLMachine Learning (Statistics)

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 1 HN submission from May 2019 to May 2019. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.