<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Fixed-Depth Two-Qubit Circuits and the Monodromy Polytope · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1904.10541/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1904.10541/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Fixed-Depth Two-Qubit Circuits and the Monodromy Polytope — mentioned by reikonomusha</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19974426</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1904.10541:19974426</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2019 20:15:51 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I do computer mathematics. I’m the author of a computational group theory package [2], and my day job is in quantum mechanics and quantum computation, but in that I’m building packages in a software engineering capacity. The algebra gets pretty gnarly. Check out a recent paper, which includes both a math [0] and SW [1] component. Perhaps because of this I’m unusually representative of the intersection between math and software. I hope folks aren’t finding my comments hostile. I have used the Mathematica product before in their GUI and at the command line, and some of my colleagues use it for…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1904.10541/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
