<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>SpecAugment: A Simple Data Augmentation Method for Automatic Speech Recognition · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1904.08779/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1904.08779/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>SpecAugment: A Simple Data Augmentation Method for Automatic Speech Recognition — mentioned by est31</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21711254</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1904.08779:21711254</guid><pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2019 10:21:06 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;LibriSpeech test clean is without background noise, with a good microphone, and most likely biased to native speakers (it is 50/50 male/female at least). In summary, it&amp;#x27;s not what an ASR engine will encounter. However, the dataset is used as a common method to benchmark ASR engines and thus that number is valuable. The SpecAugment paper by Google for example claims a 2.5% word error rate [1] on that corpus (using only LibriSpeech for training data). [1]: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1904.08779.pdf&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1904.08779/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>eess.AS</category></item></channel></rss>
