<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Interpretable hypothesis tests · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1904.06605/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1904.06605/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Interpretable hypothesis tests — mentioned by no_identd</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20971257</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1904.06605:20971257</guid><pubDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2019 15:09:10 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;#x27;s an alternative: https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.06605 Victor Coscrato, Luís Gustavo Esteves, Rafael Izbicki, Rafael Bassi Stern — Interpretable hypothesis tests (2019) Abstract: Although hypothesis tests play a prominent role in Science, their interpretation can be challenging. Three issues are (i) the difficulty in making an assertive decision based on the output of an hypothesis test, (ii) the logical contradictions that occur in multiple hypothesis testing, and (iii) the possible lack of practical importance when rejecting a precise hypothesis. These issues can be addressed through the…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1904.06605/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>stat.ME</category></item></channel></rss>
