<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Deep Learning for Face Recognition: Pride or Prejudiced? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1904.01219/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1904.01219/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Deep Learning for Face Recognition: Pride or Prejudiced? — mentioned by BelenusMordred</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25757956</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1904.01219:25757956</guid><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2021 04:05:34 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Does anyone else get tired of this non-stop narrative pushing in headlines? The patent is innocuous while the article constantly clutches at straws trying to make it sound evil. It&amp;#x27;s about posture and gait estimation and mentions ethnicity in China once, nothing novel at all other than locking it down in Chinese patent courts. There&amp;#x27;s two links of this same article (one uses the .co.uk tld) on the front page right now, neither has comments and the article itself is hilariously bad. First subheading: &amp;quot;Forced-labour camps&amp;quot; Oh jeez maybe it wasn&amp;#x27;t about computer vision and race detection after…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1904.01219/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
