HackerPapers

arXiv:1903.12097astro-ph.CO

A new measurement of the Hubble constant and matter content of the Universe using extragalactic background light $γ$-ray attenuation

Alberto Domínguez, Radoslaw Wojtak, Justin Finke, Marco Ajello, Kari Helgason, Francisco Prada, Abhishek Desai, Vaidehi Paliya, Lea Marcotulli, Dieter Hartmann

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

The Hubble constant $H_{0}$ and matter density $Ω_{m}$ of the Universe are measured using the latest $γ$-ray attenuation results from Fermi-LAT and Cherenkov telescopes. This methodology is based upon the fact that the extragalactic background light supplies opacity for very high energy photons via photon-photon interaction. The amount of $γ$-ray attenuation along the line of sight depends on the expansion rate and matter content of the Universe. This novel strategy results in a value of $H_{0}=67.4_{-6.2}^{+6.0}$~km~s$^{-1}$~Mpc$^{-1}$ and $Ω_{m}=0.14_{-0.07}^{+0.06}$. These estimates are independent and complementary to those based on the distance ladder, cosmic microwave background (CMB), clustering with weak lensing, and strong lensing data. We also produce a joint likelihood analysis of our results from $γ$ rays and these from more mature methodologies, excluding the CMB, yielding a combined value of $H_{0}=66.6\pm 1.6$~km~s$^{-1}$~Mpc$^{-1}$ and $Ω_{m}=0.29\pm 0.02$.

arXiv comments
9 pages, 6 figures, 1 table. Accepted by ApJ
Journal reference
DOI
doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4a0e
Subjects
astro-ph.COCosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Nov 2019 to Nov 2019.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • The paper is https://arxiv.org/pdf/1903.12097.pdf for anyone interested. The results aren't actually that interesting. The posterior on H0 (the rate that the universe is expanding) is not at all competitive with the current best methods. They get 67 +/- 6 whereas things like…

      astro123View on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.