HackerPapers

arXiv:1903.07603astro-ph.CO

Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid Standards Provide a 1% Foundation for the Determination of the Hubble Constant and Stronger Evidence for Physics Beyond LambdaCDM

Adam G. Riess, Stefano Casertano, Wenlong Yuan, Lucas M. Macri, Dan Scolnic

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

We present an improved determination of the Hubble constant (H0) from Hubble Space Telescope (HST) observations of 70 long-period Cepheids in the Large Magellanic Cloud. These were obtained with the same WFC3 photometric system used to measure Cepheids in the hosts of Type Ia supernovae. Gyroscopic control of HST was employed to reduce overheads while collecting a large sample of widely-separated Cepheids. The Cepheid Period-Luminosity relation provides a zeropoint-free link with 0.4% precision between the new 1.2% geometric distance to the LMC from Detached Eclipsing Binaries (DEBs) measured by Pietrzynski et al (2019) and the luminosity of SNe Ia. Measurements and analysis of the LMC Cepheids were completed prior to knowledge of the new LMC distance. Combined with a refined calibration of the count-rate linearity of WFC3-IR with 0.1% precision (Riess et al 2019), these three improved elements together reduce the full uncertainty in the LMC geometric calibration of the Cepheid distance ladder from 2.5% to 1.3%. Using only the LMC DEBs to calibrate the ladder we find H0=74.22 +/- 1.82 km/s/Mpc including systematic uncertainties, 3% higher than before for this particular anchor. Combining the LMC DEBs, masers in NGC 4258 and Milky Way parallaxes yields our best estimate: H0 = 74.03 +/- 1.42 km/s/Mpc, including systematics, an uncertainty of 1.91%---15% lower than our best previous result. Removing any one of these anchors changes H0 by < 0.7%. The difference between H0 measured locally and the value inferred from Planck CMB+LCDM is 6.6+/-1.5 km/s/Mpc or 4.4 sigma (P=99.999% for Gaussian errors) in significance, raising the discrepancy beyond a plausible level of chance. We summarize independent tests which show this discrepancy is not readily attributable to an error in any one source or measurement, increasing the odds that it results from a cosmological feature beyond LambdaCDM.

arXiv comments
accepted by ApJ, replaced with accepted version, 25 pages, 5 figures
Journal reference
DOI
doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab1422
Subjects
astro-ph.COCosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics astro-ph.GAAstrophysics of Galaxies

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from May 2019 to May 2019. Found in 1 HN submission from Jul 2019 to Jul 2019. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • The paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.07603 The disagreement existed for years already, the news is one more value from those measurements using the "distance ladder" which disagrees with the values obtained from "CMB and BAO" method. Both groups believe they haven't made any…

      acqqView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.