<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>SPOILER: Speculative Load Hazards Boost Rowhammer and Cache Attacks · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1903.00446/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1903.00446/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>SPOILER: Speculative Load Hazards Boost Rowhammer and Cache Attacks — mentioned by runeks</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19423118</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1903.00446:19423118</guid><pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 17:31:34 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The paper, from the authors that found SPOILER, already states they were unable to exploit AMD processors: “The analyzed ARM and AMD processors do not show similar behaviour”. [1] [1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1903.00446.pdf&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1903.00446/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item><item><title>SPOILER: Speculative Load Hazards Boost Rowhammer and Cache Attacks — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19316785</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1903.00446:19316785</guid><pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2019 06:33:15 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Spoiler: Speculative Load Hazards Boost Rowhammer and Cache Attacks [pdf]&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1903.00446/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item><item><title>SPOILER: Speculative Load Hazards Boost Rowhammer and Cache Attacks — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19313936</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1903.00446:19313936</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 20:30:50 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Spoiler: Speculative Load Hazards Boost Rowhammer and Cache Attacks&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;35 points; 4 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1903.00446/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item><item><title>SPOILER: Speculative Load Hazards Boost Rowhammer and Cache Attacks — mentioned by convivialdingo</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19313729</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1903.00446:19313729</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 20:05:26 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;From the paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1903.00446.pdf 1.1 Our Contribution We have discovered a novel microarchitectural leakage which reveals critical information about physical page mappings to user space processes. The leakage can be exploited by a limited set of instructions, which is visible in all Intel genera- tions starting from the 1st generation of Intel Core processors, independent of the OS and also works from within virtual ma- chines and sandboxed environments. In summary, this work: 1. exposes a previously unknown microarchitectural leak- age stemming from the false dependency…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1903.00446/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item><item><title>SPOILER: Speculative Load Hazards Boost Rowhammer and Cache Attacks — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19309156</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1903.00446:19309156</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 08:50:57 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Spoiler: Speculative Load Hazards Boost Rowhammer and Cache Attacks&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;7 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1903.00446/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
