<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Lower Bounds for Multiplication via Network Coding · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1902.10935/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1902.10935/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Lower Bounds for Multiplication via Network Coding — mentioned by EvgeniyZh</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23920855</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1902.10935:23920855</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2020 19:51:44 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;There is a (conditional) proof that nlogn is optimal: https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.10935&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1902.10935/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DS</category></item><item><title>Lower Bounds for Multiplication via Network Coding — mentioned by ogogmad</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23920620</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1902.10935:23920620</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2020 19:26:08 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;According to the article, it rests on a plausible conjecture. I need to read further. [edit] According to the abstract of the paper referred to in the article (https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.10935) it rests on a &amp;quot;central conjecture in the area of network coding&amp;quot;. Make of that what you will.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1902.10935/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DS</category></item><item><title>Lower Bounds for Multiplication via Network Coding — mentioned by gumby</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19686311</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1902.10935:19686311</guid><pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 20:41:01 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The article says that it may be the fastest: &amp;gt; At the end of February, a team of computer scientists at Aarhus University posted a paper [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.10935 ] arguing that if another unproven conjecture is also true, this is indeed the fastest way multiplication can be done.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1902.10935/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DS</category></item><item><title>Lower Bounds for Multiplication via Network Coding — mentioned by moab</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19480746</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1902.10935:19480746</guid><pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 07:01:01 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This very recent paper shows a matching (conditional) lower bound of \Omega(n\log n): https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.10935 (the hardness is from a conjecture in network coding).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1902.10935/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DS</category></item><item><title>Lower Bounds for Multiplication via Network Coding — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19293636</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1902.10935:19293636</guid><pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2019 09:43:03 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Lower bounds for the cost of multiplication via network coding&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1902.10935/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DS</category></item></channel></rss>
