HackerPapers

arXiv:1902.09725cs.AI

Conservative Agency via Attainable Utility Preservation

Alexander Matt Turner, Dylan Hadfield-Menell, Prasad Tadepalli

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Reward functions are easy to misspecify; although designers can make corrections after observing mistakes, an agent pursuing a misspecified reward function can irreversibly change the state of its environment. If that change precludes optimization of the correctly specified reward function, then correction is futile. For example, a robotic factory assistant could break expensive equipment due to a reward misspecification; even if the designers immediately correct the reward function, the damage is done. To mitigate this risk, we introduce an approach that balances optimization of the primary reward function with preservation of the ability to optimize auxiliary reward functions. Surprisingly, even when the auxiliary reward functions are randomly generated and therefore uninformative about the correctly specified reward function, this approach induces conservative, effective behavior.

arXiv comments
Published in AI, Ethics, and Society 2020
Journal reference
DOI
doi:10.1145/3375627.3375851
Subjects
cs.AIArtificial Intelligence

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Nov 2019 to Nov 2019.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • There's a lot of interesting research focused on this problem space, training algorithms toward a more flexible problem-solving ability. Here are a couple: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.09725.pdf https://openreview.net/pdf?id=Skc-Fo4Yg I do think the DeepMind team is pretty aware…

      vonnikView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.