<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Weak Call-By-Value λ-Calculus is Reasonable for Both Time and Space · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1902.07515/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1902.07515/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Weak Call-By-Value λ-Calculus is Reasonable for Both Time and Space — mentioned by mananaysiempre</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28563000</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1902.07515:28563000</guid><pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 09:14:01 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Didn’t have access to my archive at the time, so got some of the details wrong it seems (e.g. CbV not CbN, result for time is older than I remembered). Main thrust should remain valid, but be careful. In any case, here you go: Dal Lago, Martini (2008). “The weak lambda calculus as a reasonable machine”. DOI:10.1016/j.tcs.2008.01.044, apparently not on arXiv. Accattoli (2012). “A fresh look at the lambda-calculus”. DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2019.1, apparently not on arXiv. Accattoli, Dal Lago (2014). “Beta reduction is invariant, indeed”. DOI: 10.1145/2603088.2603105, arXiv: 1405.3311 [cs.LO].…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1902.07515/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CC</category></item></channel></rss>
