<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Estimating Network Effects Using Naturally Occurring Peer Notification Queue Counterfactuals · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1902.07133/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1902.07133/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Estimating Network Effects Using Naturally Occurring Peer Notification Queue Counterfactuals — mentioned by pgtan</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19275310</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1902.07133:19275310</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 21:19:43 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Typesetting, proofreading, copy editing, indexing, graphics editing etc. come in mind. Just look at random &amp;quot;not so well formed&amp;quot; Word file like for example: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.07133.pdf Not commenting the bad typography of text, math, tables, etc., just try to estimate the effort for converting the references in well-formed and validated BibTeX entries.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1902.07133/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SI</category></item></channel></rss>
