<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Experimental test of local observer-independence · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1902.05080/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1902.05080/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Experimental test of local observer-independence — mentioned by magicalhippo</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23220371</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1902.05080:23220371</guid><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2020 09:51:36 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; So measurement is just theoretical concept that relates to system physically getting immensely less fuzzy to a point we can safely assume for the sake of easier calculations that it&amp;#x27;s not fuzzy at all. It appears to be more complicated than that, see Wigner&amp;#x27;s friend[1] thought experiment and a recent experimental realization of it[2]. From the paper&amp;#x27;s abstract: &amp;quot;In a state-of-the-art 6-photon experiment, we realise this extended Wigner’s friend scenario, experimentally violating the associated Bell-type inequality by 5 standard deviations. If one holds fast to the assumptions of locality…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1902.05080/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Experimental test of local observer-independence — mentioned by Alekanekelo</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21538539</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1902.05080:21538539</guid><pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2019 19:31:36 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;A preprint of the paper is available on arXiv [1]. [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.05080&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1902.05080/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Experimental test of local observer-independence — mentioned by magicalhippo</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20772166</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1902.05080:20772166</guid><pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2019 20:40:33 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Wave collapse feels like nonsense, requires arbitrary notions of &amp;quot;observers&amp;quot;. There&amp;#x27;s recently been a long thread over on PhysicsForums[1] about the Wiegner&amp;#x27;s friend experiment[2]. The thread was kicked off by this[3] paper detailing a realization of the experiment, in which the authors conclude &amp;quot;this result lends considerable strength to interpretations of quantum theory already set in an observer-dependent framework and demands for revision of those which are not.&amp;quot; Then again as far as I can see MWI doesn&amp;#x27;t come out victorious, &amp;quot;one way to accommodate our result is by proclaiming that…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1902.05080/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Experimental test of local observer-independence — mentioned by TheOtherHobbes</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19701518</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1902.05080:19701518</guid><pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2019 17:54:09 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;#x27;s a nice paradox: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.05080.pdf&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1902.05080/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Experimental test of local observer-independence — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19404873</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1902.05080:19404873</guid><pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2019 22:23:21 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Experimental rejection of observer-independence in the quantum world&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;187 points; 111 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1902.05080/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Experimental test of local observer-independence — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19377287</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1902.05080:19377287</guid><pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 10:14:45 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Experimental rejection of observer-independence in the quantum world&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 1 discussion reply on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1902.05080/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Experimental test of local observer-independence — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19366854</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1902.05080:19366854</guid><pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 10:43:08 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Experimental rejection of observer-independence in the quantum world&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1902.05080/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
