<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Neural Inverse Knitting: From Images to Manufacturing Instructions · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1902.02752/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1902.02752/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Neural Inverse Knitting: From Images to Manufacturing Instructions — mentioned by alanbernstein</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22729624</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1902.02752:22729624</guid><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2020 16:47:35 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Your general point is valid, but I can&amp;#x27;t help pointing out that knitting may not belong in that second list as much as the others. Computational textile work is a niche, but fascinating, area of research. Knitting and crocheting are highly technical crafts, and there are opportunities to use modern computational approaches, including deep learning, in them. Deep Knitting: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.02752.pdf I&amp;#x27;m not going to read this paper in detail, it may not be a great example of a successful deep learning application - but at least it&amp;#x27;s not an absurd idea. Maybe not surprising if you&amp;#x27;re…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1902.02752/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
