HackerPapers

arXiv:1902.00423cs.CV

Do We Train on Test Data? Purging CIFAR of Near-Duplicates

Björn Barz, Joachim Denzler

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

The CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 datasets are two of the most heavily benchmarked datasets in computer vision and are often used to evaluate novel methods and model architectures in the field of deep learning. However, we find that 3.3% and 10% of the images from the test sets of these datasets have duplicates in the training set. These duplicates are easily recognizable by memorization and may, hence, bias the comparison of image recognition techniques regarding their generalization capability. To eliminate this bias, we provide the "fair CIFAR" (ciFAIR) dataset, where we replaced all duplicates in the test sets with new images sampled from the same domain. We then re-evaluate the classification performance of various popular state-of-the-art CNN architectures on these new test sets to investigate whether recent research has overfitted to memorizing data instead of learning abstract concepts. We find a significant drop in classification accuracy of between 9% and 14% relative to the original performance on the duplicate-free test set. The ciFAIR dataset and pre-trained models are available at https://cvjena.github.io/cifair/, where we also maintain a leaderboard.

arXiv comments
Journal of Imaging
Journal reference
Journal of Imaging. 2020; 6(6):41
DOI
doi:10.3390/jimaging6060041
Subjects
cs.CVComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 1 HN submission from Jun 2020 to Jun 2020. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.