<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>On isogenies among certain abelian surfaces · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1901.09846/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1901.09846/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>On isogenies among certain abelian surfaces — mentioned by xyzzyz</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19050587</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1901.09846:19050587</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2019 00:36:34 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Related, I feel we need to figure out a way to systematize information in scientific papers to make mining them for cross-cutting insights possible. I suspect there are lots of discoveries hiding in plain sight, if one knew which particular papers from which disciplines touch on the same underlying phenomenon or concept. This is interesting problem, unfortunately it&amp;#x27;s really, really hard. I&amp;#x27;m most familiar with mathematics, so I&amp;#x27;ll use it as an example, but this is not limited to mathematics. If you take any new paper on research mathematics, in a hot field like algebraic geometry or partial…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1901.09846/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.AG</category></item></channel></rss>
