HackerPapers

arXiv:1901.07068hep-ex

Neutrino Mistakes: Wrong tracks and Hints, Hopes and Failures

Maury C Goodman

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

In the last two decades, the field of neutrino physics has made enormous progress in measuring the strength and frequency of neutrino and antineutrino oscillations. Along the way, there have been many instances of misunderstanding which led to wrong measurements or speculation for new features of neutrino physics that are not now accepted as correct. This is part of the natural process of science, but given the well-accepted notion that we learn from our mistakes, it is worthwhile to look at some examples and see what the lessons might be. With that goal in mind, I have a list of results which might be termed neutrino mistakes, with the fact in mind that there is no well-accepted definition of a mistake, and no unique threshold for counting something as a mistake when you change your mind after you obtain more information. After making the list, I chose seven of them to discuss. No clear conclusions were drawn from this exercise, but some interesting issues regarding putative wrong results are discussed.

arXiv comments
For the Proceedings of the International Conference on the History of Neutrino, 5-7 September 2018, Paris France
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
hep-exHigh Energy Physics, Experiment hep-phHigh Energy Physics, Phenomenology physics.hist-phHistory and Philosophy of Physics

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 1 HN submission from Jan 2019 to Jan 2019. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.