<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Mechanism to Mitigate AVX-Induced Frequency Reduction · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1901.04982/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1901.04982/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Mechanism to Mitigate AVX-Induced Frequency Reduction — mentioned by d5lt5</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49017494</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1901.04982:49017494</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 06:08:15 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Remember that bug with Intel Skylakes [0]? When an application used AVX, it slowed down everything else on that node. It was by far not easy to debug why some applications randomly suffered perf hits on a new hardware being rolled out in Azure. [0] https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.04982?utm_source=chatgpt.com&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1901.04982/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DC</category></item></channel></rss>
