<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Black holes and quantum entanglement · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1901.01149/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1901.01149/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Black holes and quantum entanglement — mentioned by balsam</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30931066</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1901.01149:30931066</guid><pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2022 11:59:41 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Aha, that is my point! To quote: “The crux of the problem lies in an assumption about the structure of entanglement across the event horizon, namely, that the Hilbert space factorizes. While valid in quantum mechanics, this fails drastically in quantum field theory” https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.01149 So already QFT and QM are disputing..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1901.01149/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.pop-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
