<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Negentropy concept revisited: Standard thermodynamic properties of 16 bacteria, fungi and algae species · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1901.00494/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1901.00494/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Negentropy concept revisited: Standard thermodynamic properties of 16 bacteria, fungi and algae species — mentioned by reliablereason</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46078602</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1901.00494:46078602</guid><pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 13:47:17 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Initially i asked a AI for standard values but here is a proper source: - Negentropy concept revisited: Standard thermodynamic properties of 16 bacteria, fungi and algae species ( https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.00494) &amp;gt; Maybe you meant that radiation alone wouldn&amp;#x27;t be enough for that growth, so there&amp;#x27;d be other components that it&amp;#x27;s helping with. Yes. Clearly it grew as it grew, but the question is what drove/powered the growth.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1901.00494/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.bio-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
