<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Solving Archaeological Puzzles · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1812.10553/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1812.10553/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Solving Archaeological Puzzles — mentioned by ludwigschubert</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27487725</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1812.10553:27487725</guid><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2021 21:53:36 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Ah, I think I may see the missed connection! It&amp;#x27;s like a jigsaw puzzle because archaeologists really do assemble fragments of old scripts. Sometimes the translation efforts can only give you probabilistic answers that in turn influence where you&amp;#x27;re likely to place a fragment. A family member of mine works in the space academically, and they really have giant catalogues with pictures of fragments, and they experiment with different arrangements and what they would mean to their translation efforts. Unfortunately I don&amp;#x27;t have a link. :/ EDIT: a random CS paper that talks about automated…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1812.10553/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
