<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Training Deep Neural Networks with 8-bit Floating Point Numbers · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1812.08011/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1812.08011/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Training Deep Neural Networks with 8-bit Floating Point Numbers — mentioned by danuker</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31503669</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1812.08011:31503669</guid><pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2022 12:38:22 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; using a 32 bit integer on a 64 bit platform? Not about integers, but in general: maybe 64-bit is overkill. The trend in ML has been to reduce size: &amp;quot;We have demonstrated DNN training [using nVidia GPUs] with 8-bit floating point numbers (FP8) that achieves 2−4× speedup [compared to FP32 computation] without compromise in accuracy [on most CNN/DNN test accuracy degradation is ~0% stochastically, but max 2% on specific ImageNet runs].&amp;quot; https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.08011&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1812.08011/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
