<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>New Large Cardinal Axioms and the Ultimate-L Program · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1812.03837/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1812.03837/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>New Large Cardinal Axioms and the Ultimate-L Program — mentioned by chx</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26508767</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1812.03837:26508767</guid><pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 23:40:49 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Ad hominem attacks, especially in mathematics should not stand but still I would give a heads up to laypeople: be very very cautious about just accepting this until further reviews are done because this is not the first time he submitted a paper with absolutely bombastic results which has been proven flawed. https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.09678 is withdrawn and https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.03837 is still being revised and from what I read about the latter the chances of it being salvaged is very low. Here&amp;#x27;s one of the easiest to understand comments about it: &amp;gt; I have attempted to read through the…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1812.03837/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.LO</category></item></channel></rss>
