<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Learning Implicit Fields for Generative Shape Modeling · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1812.02822/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1812.02822/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Learning Implicit Fields for Generative Shape Modeling — mentioned by dartmoose</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25952638</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1812.02822:25952638</guid><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 01:58:25 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;My understanding of this paper (please comment/correct based on your understanding): * Instead of using a single latent feature per each implicit surface, the authors propose using a &amp;quot;volume&amp;quot; of latent features per each surface. This allows for the NNs to better capture the geometric detail while remaining relatively shallow. The result is a more accurate and faster to compute neural SDF. Contrary to the claim of another comment, the neural SDF alone is not the interesting part of this paper--the prior works points to at least three other papers that have explored the idea of representing an…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1812.02822/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.GR</category></item></channel></rss>
