<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Defining the Proton Radius: a Unified Treatment · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1812.02714/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1812.02714/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Defining the Proton Radius: a Unified Treatment — mentioned by whatshisface</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20941059</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1812.02714:20941059</guid><pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2019 15:18:27 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Usually the radius of something like a proton or an atom takes the form of a parameter in an equation that just-so-happens to be measured in a unit of length. It&amp;#x27;s not defined specifically to be an indication of the extent of the particle, it just happens to roughly be about the right size. This paper[0] says that it is defined in terms of a &amp;quot;probability amplitude that an interaction between a photon of four-momentum q^μ (Q2=−q2) and a charged constituent of the proton can absorb such a momentum with the proton remaining in its ground state.&amp;quot; So, not exactly a radius, but &amp;quot;radius&amp;quot; is an okay…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1812.02714/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>nucl-th</category></item></channel></rss>
