<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Deep Signal Recovery with One-Bit Quantization · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1812.00797/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1812.00797/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Deep Signal Recovery with One-Bit Quantization — mentioned by typicalguy</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19163238</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1812.00797:19163238</guid><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2019 16:40:20 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Very interesting topic. Indeed, one way to interpret the neural networks is to design the deep architecture interpretable at the first place. Namely, one can design the structure and activation functions of each layer to mimic one step of gradient descent. Then, K layer of this tailored DNN resembles K iterations of an optimization algorithm, e.g., see [1-3]. But still, one need to prove the convergence of such networks (empirical results show very promising convergence speed). [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.00797 [2] https://openreview.net/pdf?id=B1lnzn0ctQ [3]…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1812.00797/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>eess.SP</category></item></channel></rss>
